Logo
  • About Us
  • Social Media
  • Media Training
  • Strategic Counsel
  • Crisis Planning
  • Media Monitoring
  • Case Studies
  • Contact
« Older posts
  • Issues Management - Crisis Communication

    The news cycle never sleeps, and the bar for what is considered “news” continues to be lowered. One negative article, blog or tweet can snowball and company reputations that have taken years to build can crumble in an instant.

    Understanding this changing media landscape, where news can be contained in 140 characters or less, is half the battle. At GroundFloor Media Communications in Denver, our senior-level professionals have real-world, first-hand experience working with our clients to manage issues such as litigation (criminal, civil, class action and otherwise) layoffs, sales, ethical or data breaches, customer issues, employee issues, social media attacks, natural disasters and school shootings, to name a few. We also conduct media training, develop crisis plans and offer strategic counsel.

Radio Interview: GFM’s Barb Jones on Reputation Rehab

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 21, 2012

In a radio interview with Inside Communications with Mike Bako, Barb Jones, Senior Director of Communications at Ground Floor Media joined the program. She discussed the role of Public relations and its importance during a communication crisis or media scandal. She elaborated in her interview and article about the importance of going farther than strong public relations work to repair any damages.

In her article “Does Mexico Have a Branding Problem? Why it Takes More than PR to Rehab Reputation,” Barb discusses the difficulties Mexico is having with attracting tourists to the country. She states the issue of repairing a broken reputation and states “It’s common knowledge that an organization or individual’s reputation that is built over many years or a lifetime can be destroyed in an instant. Penn State is the most recent example” It goes on to show that many companies have been boughtout, changed names or just completely disappeared (i.e.Enron).

In her interview with Mike, she discusses what it will take to repair an image, especially with the the events surrounding the Penn State scandal, Mexico’s tourism issue, Costa Concordia cruise sinking and the events with Suzanne G. Komen and Planned Parenthood. She makes a case that “it takes months or years to rebuilt relationships with target audiences. Its building trust, its slow and painful, but you can’t ignore it.”

Read the full article here.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

4 tips to help PR clients navigate the political season

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 14, 2012

Don’t mess with people’s politics. If you do, you’d better have a good reason for it and a strong response plan.

The drama surrounding the Susan G. Komen fiasco is yet another example of how seriously the public takes its politics. The organization that gave special meaning to the color pink, came crashing down when it became known that it had pulled its $700,000 contribution to Planned Parenthood.

Without taking sides on the political issue, one is safe in saying the loss in future contributions and damage to Komen’s reputation will total much more than $700,000.

It’s a good lesson, particularly now that the political season is in full throttle, to review our clients’ political stances and contributions. Clearly, having a heads-up that the CEO is making a contribution to a particular candidate can help in issues-management planning. Here are some tips to help clients get through the season without becoming too much of a target.

Research: Find out whom and which issues your clients support. Even if those stances are not popular, knowing about them before they blow up on a client’s Facebook page can help.

Bigger Picture: Using Komen as an example, there should be a discussion with clients about whether supporting or discontinuing support for a hot-button cause or candidate might do more harm than good. Even if the clients disagree, as PR pros we’ve done our job offering them the likeliest fallout scenarios.

Strategy: Have in place a plan for responding to the media and on social media before a political firestorm hits. Part of the reason Komen had a hard time was the silence on its Facebook page as the deluge of negative comments was posted. A quick, thoughtful response can help.

Grow a thick skin: Politics is nasty business, and facts often get lost in emotions and longstanding beliefs. Even the most robust response plan can get sabotaged. Clients who are aware of the risks of playing politics can better weather the storm, stick to their convictions, and offer measured responses.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Reputation Management | Tagged crisis communication, crisis response, denver, gil rudawsky, groundfloor, issue management, komen, media, planned parenthood, politics | Leave a comment

Investigation quietly dropped, Lance Armstrong and PR team can take victory lap

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 9, 2012

Lance Armstrong may never win in the courtroom of public opinion, but he can claim victory in his highly publicized case with federal investigators.

In contrast to the government’s headline-grabbing announcement two years ago that it planned to investigate Armstrong’s alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs, the feds on Friday quietly dropped the case for lack of evidence.

It started making the rounds with the media on Wednesday, but the news was a whisper compared with the crescendo it reached when the case was announced. It’s one of the failings of the media, and a lesson for clients: The launching of an investigation—or the filing of a civil suit—often gets more press than its resolution.

It was only by chance that someone found out this case had been dropped. Many cases simply get tucked away with nary a word, leaving people to wonder what happened—if they haven’t forgotten about them altogether.

We work hard to help clients understand that the government, which media outlets regularly criticize for alleged waste and wrongdoing, gets a free pass when it announces investigations. It gets back to the cliché of being guilty until proven innocent.

Armstrong’s PR team played the case artfully over the last two years. It didn’t engage in the back-and-forth drama engulfing the world-famous cyclist. Instead, it asserted his innocence and pointed to a host of other failed investigations. The truth, or lack of provable evidence, came out in the legal case, but that won’t make big headlines.

At least one media outlet, The Washington Post, notes the irony and turned the spotlight inward:

“While something less than a complete exoneration of Armstrong, the muted end of the investigation raises questions about the media: Did they go too far in painting a picture of misfeasance and illegal behavior by the seven-time Tour de France winner? And did they fail to ask some tough questions about the government’s case?”

Armstrong’s team always pointed to the facts, and even responded to a frontal assault by “60 Minutes” with a single tweet and created a response website that laid out the facts and included backup countering the stream of innuendo.

Robert Luskin, one of Armstrong’s attorneys, told The Washington Post that the news media lapped up the story because they felt it was too good not to be true.

“They become seduced by their sources and take too much at face value,” he said. “No one stops and says, ‘That doesn’t sound right to me.’ ”

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, In the News | Tagged crisis communication, crisis response, Lance Armstrong, public relations, rapid response, tour de france | Leave a comment

‘Off the record’ vs. ‘on background’: What every PR pro should know before talking to the media

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: January 31, 2012

The concepts of “on background” and “off the record” are confusing even to some seasoned reporters. It’s no wonder the PR world gets them wrong so often.

In the era of quick-hit reporting and little or no source-building, there are times when it makes sense to provide the media more than simply a short official statement.

In most crisis communication scenarios, a statement is the go-to, tried and true media response. Longer interviews or long responses get shortened or paraphrased—and often misrepresented. There are ways to get an issue across outside of an official statement, but they, too, have pitfalls.

Among those ways is to speak to a reporter off the record.

Going off the record with the media means providing them information that they cannot use. Presumably, they can use the information to help formulate their story or to ask further questions. It should never come out that the information came from you.

It’s a dangerous proposition, and, more often than not, the off-the-record information makes its way into the story, and it becomes clear who provided it. Having a solid rapport with a reporter is the only way this tactic works; otherwise, there is a good chance you will get burned, particularly if the information is juicy.

As a reporter I refused to listen to off-the-record information from sources, because I was afraid that it would end up in my stories and, often times, I suspected it was a trap to get me in trouble.

As a PR practitioner, I recommend never going off the record with the media.

(Find out here why another PR professional thinks you should never go off the record.)

Instead, it might be more useful to provide background information to a reporter. Giving information on background means providing reporters with information that they can use in their stories but cannot attribute to you because it has come from another source.

Though journalists will probably extract text solely from a statement, background information can change the tenor or angle of a story. This is particularly true when you provide factual background documents not intended for public consumption.

With both off-the-record and background discussions, there are gray areas and potential pitfalls. We tell our clients, based on experience in and out of the newsroom, never tell a reporter anything that you don’t want to see in a story.

If you or your client feels compelled to use these tactics, make your expectations clear before passing along the information. Be sure the reporter knows the source and understands the restrictions on its use. Or tell the reporter that the information is off the record and cannot be used or traced back to you. Even then, don’t be surprised if it does.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Media Training | Tagged background, communication, crisis, crisis response, groundfloor media, media, off the record, social media, training | 1 Comment

5 takeaways from the Papa John’s debacle

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: January 13, 2012

It’s a new year and time to dust off your social media crisis plan. Need motivation? Just check out how Papa John’s is mired in the damage caused this week when a single tweet started a media firestorm.

An unofficial count found nearly 500 news hits covering the Papa John’s story. It began with a 10-word tweet from a customer, accompanied by a twitpic of her Papa John’s receipt that referred to her as “lady chinky eyes.”

The customer is the communications manager for ProPublica, a nonprofit investigative journalism outlet.

Now there are calls for boycotts, and phone lines at this particular upper Manhattan franchise are overloaded with prank calls from people ordering Chinese food.

Papa John’s Twitter account went from ebullient tweets about reaching 2 million Facebook fans and giving away free pizzas to posting hundreds of responses about the incident, saying over and over: “We are very upset by recent receipt issue in New York & sincerely apologize to our customer. Franchise employee involved is being terminated.”

The issue was compounded when an employee was quoted in the media as saying, “I think the lady put it out there just to get some attention—some people like that type of attention. I truly don’t think it’s fair. It’s been taking up all our time. It’s been very disruptive.”

I bet it has.

Using this particular incident as a jumping-off point, here are several tips that should be included in any social media crisis plan:

Take immediate action. The speed at which bad news spreads on social media is mind-boggling. Companies need to have a response plan that cuts through the red tape and offers an immediate and appropriate response.

Show sympathy. On social media, an apology goes a long way. No company can manage what every employee does, but it can have policies in place to keep crises from happening. Linking to the policy and getting rid of the employee who breached it are good first steps.

Have one official spokesperson. Route all calls to an official spokesperson, one who knows the messaging. Front-line employees are busy with their jobs and may not be aware of the potential repercussions of their comments.

Ensure it won’t reoccur. Learn from the crisis, and put measures in place to minimize the chances of its happening again.

Think bigger picture. A reputation takes a long time to heal, but grand gestures can help. In the case of Papa John’s, maybe a generous donation to a relevant charity might be on point.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Reputation Management, Social Media | Tagged crisis response, denver, expert, groundfloor, issues management, media, papa johns, reputation, Twitter | Leave a comment

Report advises PR professionals to avoid flirting, drinking and cavorting with members of the press

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: January 9, 2012

A new 56-page report documenting the made-for-television, cozy relationships between police and media during the phone-hacking scandal at the News of the World offers proof-positive that truth is stranger than fiction.

Most notable, the independent report offers advice, based on real examples, on how to change the way London’s Metropolitan Police work with the media. There are some legitimate gems in the tip sheet, but some are uniquely catered for the apparently cozy relationships in the U.K.

My favorite is the “late-night carousing” warning and how another bottle of wine might get you to spill the beans. Advice from the report simply says, “Avoid.” It’s true, drinking with a journalist is never a good idea, but I’m not sure it happens very often these days—at least on this side of the pond.

A related media tactic in the report is under the heading “Flirting,” and it’s about being careful about dropping your defenses. There is some good advice, such as reporter traps that lead you to confirm information with misleading questions or flat-out lying.

The author of the report said:

“The relationship we have with the media is an important one, we want to be as open and transparent as possible with the press because we are a public service and we need to be held to account, and we need the press and the public to help us prevent and detect crime. But there should be no more secret conversations, there should be no more improper contact—that which is of selfish not public interest. Meetings will no longer be enhanced by hospitality and alcohol.”

Here’s the list included in the “Ethical Issues Arising From The Relationship Between Police and Media” report:

1. Alcohol. Late-night carousing, long sessions, yet another bottle of wine at lunch—these are all long-standing media tactics to get you to spill the beans. Avoid.

2. Flirting. Often interlinked with alcohol. Designed to get you to drop your defenses and say far more than you intended. Be careful.

3. “I’ll make it worth your while.” If you think they mean money, say no and beat a hasty retreat. Make sure the press office and Department of Professional Standards know.

4. “A source told me the name of the man you arrested. Can you confirm the spelling?” Say no. This could be a tactic to get you to confirm a name they have been given from elsewhere so they can print it. It may be a guess, or it could be a ruse.

5. “I’ll be sacked if I miss the deadline in ten minutes. You’ve got to tell me.” Don’t be rushed. “If you don’t help me, I’m going to write a really knocking story.” They’ll probably knock you anyway. Don’t give in to threats.

6. “Can you slip me a picture? The family said it’s OK.” Did they? Does it meet the rules for disclosing pictures? What does the press office say?

7. You are on a highly sensitive investigation and the Senior Investigating Officer warned you of the dire consequences if you talked to the media, then wouldn’t it be very foolish of you to leak?

8. As a constable or sergeant, or scenes of crime officer, you may know more than your inspector or superintendent, but if you don’t get permission to deal with the media you put yourself at risk.

9. Don’t get sucked into the hurricane. Many of those who criticize police for “leaking to the media” have never watched the media descend, like a tropical storm, on a town/village/crime scene, laying bare every possible fact. They WILL establish the name and life-story of the suspect. If you’ve agreed an approach to certain information with your press office, stick to it and record it. You can then defend yourself against leak allegations.

10. It may help to assume you are being recorded when you talk to journalists.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in In the News, Media Training | Tagged crisis, denver, expert, issues management, media training, news of the world | Leave a comment

When to say ‘no’ to a PR client

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: January 6, 2012

Turning down a potential client can be hard, but in the short-term and long-term it will likely turn out to be a wise business decision that will save money and heartache.

To help make the tough call on when to say “no,” let’s review some established rules and less tangible ones that can be used before deciding to take a pass on a new client.

These are just few a red-flag rules, but if the client gets past these then the chances are better that you can create a successful relationship and do a better job of helping clients build—or rebuild—reputations.

Insist on immediate results. PR is a long-term process, particularly in crisis communications. Building a reputation can take time and an investment. Quick-hit PR campaigns rarely produce desired results.

Want to spin the news. Yes, the media landscape is fractured, but journalists can still smell when a company’s PR team is trying to spin the news. Plus, it’s just not a good practice. The truth may not get immediate results, but it helps build a brand reputation over the long-term.

Rift in the executive offices.
When there are divisions in the executive team, particularly as it relates to the PR team, it makes for an uphill battle. A successful PR campaign needs buy-in from all of the executives.

Seek a service agency. Successful PR campaigns work better when a firm is part of establishing the initial strategy, instead of simply carrying out a campaign. PR firms do this work everyday and bring established strategies, and know when to say something is not going to work, and, what will be successful.

Sketchy PR track record. There may be legitimate reasons why a company seeks to switch its PR direction and go with another firm. Take notice if the switch is a regular occurrence. It might be a sign the company doesn’t get PR or has unreasonable expectations.

No cultural fit. This red flag is based on the unscientific gut check. While you may not want to hang out with your clients after work, you do need to like and respect them and their business. Plus, work styles and expectations should mesh not just on paper.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Issues Management | Tagged communication, communications, crisis, crisis response, groundfloor, groundfloor media, rapid response, reputation management, reputation.com | Leave a comment

Newsroom layoffs rose by 30 percent in 2011

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: December 31, 2011

It used to be that the power of the press meant never crossing an industry that buys ink by the 55-gallon drum.

But the newspaper’s ink-stained wretches are fewer and farther between these days, as the predicted recovery for the battle-hardened industry has yet to materialize. Rather, the contrary has happened.

The latest survey shows that the number of newspaper jobs eliminated this year rose by 30 percent from last year.

Moreover, the number of journalism jobs at U.S. newspapers in 2011 sank below 1978 levels, the first year the survey was conducted by the American Society of News Editors (ASNE). Look no further than advertising revenues to see why the industry’s predicted comeback hasn’t materialized.

Newspaper ad sales continued their downward spiral in 2011 and are estimated to decline by 50 percent from 2005 numbers. That led to the 3,775 newsroom job cuts this year, surpassing the 2,920 cuts last year. And these are conservative estimates that don’t include losses through attrition.

The Paper Cuts blog, which tracks U.S. newspaper layoffs and buyouts, put together a map tracking job losses for this year. It looks the same as the maps used in diners, with push-pins in nearly every city in every state.

For the PR world it means more of the same: We have to target pitches better, continually update media lists, pitch only newsworthy events, and continue to focus our outreach on nontraditional media outlets.

Highlights, or lowlights, of the ASNE 2011 survey:

45,000: Number of journalism jobs at U.S. newspapers in 1978, the first year the American Society of News Editors (ASNE) conducted the survey.

41,000: Number of journalism jobs at U.S. newspapers at the end of this year.

56,900: The number of journalism newspaper jobs in 1989, the peak from 1978 to today.

1 in 3: Newsroom jobs eliminated since the number of journalists peaked at 56,900 in 1989.

3 out of 4:
Number of years The New York Times has offered buyouts, and this week its parent company announced it was selling its 16 mid-size newspapers.

15,993: The number of journalism jobs cut in 2008, the peak year for layoffs.

Adding insult to injury and exemplifying the slow death of newspapers, ASNE released the numbers via a webinar, as the annual convention has been canceled the last three years because of the dwindling number of registrants.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Issues Management | Leave a comment

Lessons in PR and journalism from Hunter S. Thompson

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: December 20, 2011

Early in my career, I spent some time with Hunter S. Thompson.

At the time, I was a cub reporter in Aspen, full of ideals but without much experience—professional or otherwise. Thompson was already a nationally known author and political/social commentator, who was still healthy and years away from giving in to his demons.

During one of our conversations at the unofficial office—the bar next door to the newspaper where I worked—I complained about being the lowest man on the totem pole. He took umbrage and said that’s exactly where you want to be. People will still trust you, and they give you the best stories.

It was true, and, to this day, my best stories were the ones I got as a rookie reporter.

I was reminded of Thompson’s career advice recently when I came across a blog that reprinted his 1958 cover letter for a job as a reporter at the Vancouver Sun.

One salient paragraph of the cover letter reads:

“As far as I’m concerned, it’s a damned shame that a field as potentially dynamic and vital as journalism should be overrun with dullards, bums, and hacks, hag-ridden with myopia, apathy, and complacence, and generally stuck in a bog of stagnant mediocrity. If this is what you’re trying to get The Sun away from, then I think I’d like to work for you.”

The brash, in-your-face prose intermingled with humor reminded me of the other lessons the late Thompson shared during one of our “business meetings” at Aspen’s lesser-known establishments. They still apply today, even after trading in my reporter hat for the world of PR:

You work for your audience, not your boss. As a reporter, this was especially true. The best stories are the ones that relate to readers or your customers, not executives or special interests. For the PR industry, remember that although we work for our clients, we will be more successful in focusing on the audience (our customers) when we pitch relevant stories and crisp content.

Stay in touch. The higher you move up in the corporate world, the farther you are from the best stories and creativity. Though moving up the ladder is a natural desire and goal, people should make an effort to get their hands dirty with the day-to-day client work, and to think of ideas that aren’t tied to spreadsheets or bonuses.

Fight convention. This is where Thompson excelled. He rarely took the party line, and when he did, it was because that’s where his beliefs were. It gets back to following what you believe or what you know, not what is expected or safe. Your audience will appreciate that approach.

Embrace what you are good at.
Thompson told me that his lifestyle didn’t work for everyone, but it sure did work for him. He had an enormous tolerance, and he excelled at living up to his reputation. He parlayed that into his stories. Though that thread is harder follow in the world of PR, the lesson, I think, is to take your strengths and capitalize on them.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in In the News, Issues Management | Tagged aspen, crisis communication, gonzo, hunter s. thompson, public relations | Leave a comment

5 things PR pros can expect in 2012

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: December 11, 2011

As we take a look into the PR crystal ball, here are some sure bets for 2012.

News media will continue to struggle. In the last month, a variety of online news sites and newspapers trimmed their staffs once again. The Denver Post, for instance, accepted buyouts from 19 staffers, whose combined experience at the paper was 470 years. For the PR world, this means only the best pitches will rise to the top, given staffing issues and declining news space.

Social media will continue to define PR. Social media will grow as our go-to venue for our clients, bypassing traditional outlets. The downside is that bad news will spread faster and reach more people, elevating the role of crisis communicators who try to control the conversation.

PR will lead technology and communication innovation.
The two are inextricably linked, so our profession will be at the forefront of new ways to communicate using emerging technologies. We also will support a new wave of communications from mommy and daddy bloggers to content aggregators.

The debate over paid versus earned media will continue. As the PR world looks to alternative messaging conduits, we will need to specify the evolving roles of paid and earned media. We will compete with marketing and SEO companies that pay for placement as we struggle to get earned hits.

PR’s role will continue to grow. Call it the court of public opinion. Clients increasingly will understand the value of proactive and reactive PR. The speed at which messages move means we will keep our seats at the strategy table. We will bring our views on the changing media world, reputation management, crisis communication, internal communication, and community relations.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Internal Communications, Social Media, Uncategorized | Tagged 2012, corporate, crisis, crisis communication, crisis response, denver, groundfloor media, issues management, social media | Leave a comment
« Older posts
  • Contact the GFM Crisis Team

    Like all blogs, we thrive on feedback, so don't be shy! If you have a comment, a suggestion or a question, please leave us a comment or shoot us an email at crisis@groundfloormedia.com or call at 303-865-8155. You can also read more about GFM at groundfloormedia.com.

  • Become a Fan on Facebook Follow GroundFloor Media on Twitter Add to Technorati Favorites The GroundFloor Media Website

  • Categories

    • Crisis Communication
    • In the News
    • Internal Communications
    • Issues Management
    • Media Training
    • Reputation Management
    • Social Media
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
  • Blogroll

    • Drudge Report
    • Politico
    • Poynter
    • PR Daily News
    • PR Disasters
    • The Daily Lark
  • GFM Rapid Response RSS Feeds

    • All posts
    • All comments
 
 
© 2012 GroundFloor Media