Logo
  • Meet GFM
  • Expertise
  • Portfolio
  • Buzz
  • Toolbox
  • Blog
  • Crisis Blog
  • Contact Us
« Older posts
Newer posts »
  • Crisis Communication and Reputation Management

    The news cycle never sleeps. One negative article, blog, comment or tweet – regardless of its accuracy – can snowball, and reputations that took years to build can crumble in an instant. Companies must be prepared for these defining moments with a strategic crisis communications plan, as their management of these situations can ultimately make or break the legacy of an organization.

    GroundFloor Media is an expert in crisis management. From not for profits to corporate clients, our Rapid Response team help organizations anticipate the types of situations they're likely to face and hone the skills they need to manage a crisis and engage their publics with an effective response. Our seasoned industry pros have real-world, first-hand experience working with local, regional and national clients to manage issues such as litigation (criminal, civil or class action), layoffs, restructuring bankruptcies, ethical or data breaches, customer complaints, employee issues, social media attacks, natural disasters and school and workplace violence.

    Our Rapid Response team routinely coordinates crisis and reputation management communication planning, conducts crisis media training, creates social media policies, manages crisis response in real time and provides ongoing strategic counsel to help companies mitigate corporate risk when a crisis or potentially negative issue occurs.

PR lessons from NPR’s revamped social media policy

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: March 8, 2012

After several high-profile embarrassments, NPR dusted off its old ethics policy and recently rolled out a new version for its journalists and staff.

The revamped 72-page policy came about after NPR analyst Juan Williams made remarks about Muslims on “The O’Reilly Factor.” He was fired, and NPR’s board conducted a review of the incident and a sweeping review of the overall policy. The review got some added urgency when an NPR executive was recorded publicly bashing conservatives and questioning the need for federal funding.

For the PR world, we can learn from NPR’s thoughtful updates to its social media policy and online interactions. Most notably, the new policies no longer treat the social media world as an oddity with no future.

“To get the most out of social media we need to understand those communities,” the policy says. “So we respect their cultures and treat those we encounter online with the same courtesy and understanding as anyone we deal with in the offline world. We do not impose ourselves on such sites. We are guests and behave as such.”

Other nuggets in the social media policy include:

First is not always best. NPR’s case study on this was how it had wrongly reported the death of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords following the shooting spree in Arizona. “Few in our audience will know or care which news organization was first to report a breaking news story,” the policy says. “But if we get it wrong, we leave a lasting mark on our reputation.”

Personal and profession lives overlap. The policy says that even with a protected Twitter account or a private Facebook profile, NPR staffers should acknowledge that whatever they post is in the public domain. “Everything you say or do in a social media environment is effectively a public statement from an NPR journalist.”

Don’t play in the rumor mill. The policy says reporting in social media spaces requires the same diligence that journalists must exercise in other environments. So, don’t retweet a story that has not been confirmed, as you many add credibility to a false or incomplete report.

Online honesty. NPR journalists should identify themselves as such when working online, covering stories, posting comments, asking questions, tweeting, retweeting, blogging, Facebooking or doing anything on social media or other online forums.

All in all, these rules should apply to PR professionals and our clients. The line between our personal lives and professional lives is no longer hard and clear.

This part of the policy says it all: In social media forums, “don’t behave any differently online than you would in any other public setting.”

(This post also appears on PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Issues Management, Social Media | Tagged brand, crisis, denver, management, NPR, policy, public relations, reputation, social media | Leave a comment

Authenticity rules crisis communication on social media

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: March 6, 2012

Authenticity rules when it comes to crisis communication, particularly online.

I just wrapped up the second day of a reputation and crisis communication conference in New York City. Here are some great social media lessons from Southwest Airlines’ Linda Rutherford, vice president of communication and strategic outreach.

Southwest leads not only the airline industry, but the corporate world for setting the standard in social media engagement. They are acutely aware that bad news about their company will break on Twitter, as it did when part of a Southwest plane’s ceiling came off. Photos were being shared on TwitPic before the plane even landed.

Southwest’s social media engagement plan includes the following points:

Don’t be afraid to join the conversation
Make it personal and authentic
Engage in the positive
Have a contingency plan BEFORE a crisis arises
Establish channels before a crisis
Don’t rely on numbers alone
Educate your employees and leaders about the value of social media
Live and breathe social media
Have fun- this in not a burden, it is a gift.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Issues Management, Reputation Management, Social Media | Tagged crisis communication, reputation management, social media | Leave a comment

GroundFloor Media attends reputation management conference

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: March 5, 2012

I just landed in New York to take part in the “Reputation Preservation and Crisis Communication Summit.”
The two-day workshop, put on by UK-based Ethical Corporation, features executives from a variety of companies discussing how they protect reputations and respond to crisis.

Companies represented include Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, AIR, Alcoa, P&G, REI and Verizon. We are hoping to learn about some best practices as we continue to grow our crisis-issues management service line. GroundFloor looks forward to sharing what we learn with our clients. In the meantime, if you have any questions, send me a note at grudawsky@groundfloormedia.com.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Reputation Management | Tagged brand management, crisis communication, reputation management, social media | Leave a comment

Dispelling PR myths with first-hand experience

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: March 2, 2012

It’s been three years since the newspaper I worked for unceremoniously shut down after pumping out news for 150 years.

Since then, I’ve redirected my skills to help reinvent myself in the world of public relations. Along the way, many myths I’d believed about PR have been disproved.

Here’s a list of some misconceptions that I, along with many of my fellow journalists, have had about PR professionals:

PR pros don’t work hard. In jumping to the PR world, I’ve seen firsthand how hard my colleagues work for clients. The idea of clocking out is just that, a nice idea. I’ve done PR work from the side of a road in Spain, in a classroom hallway at my son’s back-to-school night, and outside a restaurant on a date with my wife to celebrate our anniversary. The work never stops. At least in the newsroom, there was a lull after deadline.

There are no deadlines in PR. Deadlines rule journalists’ lives. They also rule the world of PR. In a crisis, kiss your family and any plans goodbye—it’s a steady stream of deadlines to create strategy, respond to the media, monitor social media and recap everything for the client.

There’s no stress. The same issues that keep a reporter up at night—a changing media landscape, declining business, unreasonable expectations—make for sleepless nights in the PR world, too. Our profession, like journalists’, relies on finding ways to get our clients’ stories to the right audiences. There’s an added layer of stress: Showing our clients that what we do is valuable and requires expertise and experience.

PR people don’t know how to write. It’s not unusual for me to write several thousand words a day, from press releases, to white papers, to strategy documents, to crisis plans. And it requires more insight and creativity than simply documenting what happened at a city council meeting. Plus, there’s not a team of copy editors to review everything. We have to be our own reporter, editor, copy editor, and headline writer. Sometimes we have to be our own publisher.

PR pros couldn’t make it as journalists. The line between a journalist and a PR person is very close in terms of skills. I’ve seen both worlds, and I know firsthand that many of my PR colleagues would make top-notch journalists. They know how to tell a story, ask the right questions, and can be uncompromising with their standards. They also have to have the tact to offer strategies without coming off as know-it-alls, and they stand up to clients when necessary.

PR is just spin. To the contrary, PR at its core is about getting newsworthy information to audiences, and working with the media to get the facts right and creating some balance where there is none.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, In the News, Media Training | 1 Comment

5 reasons that reporter isn’t calling you back

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 23, 2012

Having been in a newsroom for two decades, I can attest to how inundated reporters are with email and phone pitches from PR pros. And with shrinking newsrooms, I can only image it has gotten much worse.

To help PR pros tasked with cold-calling reporters and editors with pitches, here’s a basic list to help understand why journalists are not calling you back.

First, let’s just assume that reporters do not actually pick up the phone when you call, because they rarely do. Blame it on not enough time, deadline, or that they are out in the field getting stories.

Why would a reporter not call you back?

1. Your pitch is not engaging. Yes, this is the primary reason reporters ignore your pitch. Newsworthiness rules, and “so what?” pitches will be deleted immediately.

2. You’re pitching the wrong person. There has been shuffling of assignments under the guise of doing more with less, so pitches that go to the wrong reporter will be deleted rather than forwarded to the right reporter.

3. You are from out of town. This one is hard to swallow, but reporters assume that calls from an out of town PR agency will not be newsworthy for local readers. This is especially true for smaller media outlets.

4. Your pitch does not have a local angle. Publications rely on wire services to cover national stories, and they will rarely pick up on a regional or national story unless there is a strong local angle.

5. You have a track record of providing lame story pitches. This is about relationship-building and being a good source for reporters, not just a mouthpiece for a client. If you regularly fill up voicemail with nominal pitches, even the most newsworthy pitch will get deleted. Be a good source, understand when to avoid pitching junk, and remember that no one owes you a favor.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Media Training | Tagged communication, crisis, denver, issues management, media, public relations, training | Leave a comment

Radio Interview: GFM’s Barb Jones on Reputation Rehab

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 21, 2012

In a radio interview with Inside Communications with Mike Bako, Barb Jones, Senior Director of Communications at Ground Floor Media joined the program. She discussed the role of Public relations and its importance during a communication crisis or media scandal. She elaborated in her interview and article about the importance of going farther than strong public relations work to repair any damages.

In her article “Does Mexico Have a Branding Problem? Why it Takes More than PR to Rehab Reputation,” Barb discusses the difficulties Mexico is having with attracting tourists to the country. She states the issue of repairing a broken reputation and states “It’s common knowledge that an organization or individual’s reputation that is built over many years or a lifetime can be destroyed in an instant. Penn State is the most recent example” It goes on to show that many companies have been boughtout, changed names or just completely disappeared (i.e.Enron).

In her interview with Mike, she discusses what it will take to repair an image, especially with the the events surrounding the Penn State scandal, Mexico’s tourism issue, Costa Concordia cruise sinking and the events with Suzanne G. Komen and Planned Parenthood. She makes a case that “it takes months or years to rebuilt relationships with target audiences. Its building trust, its slow and painful, but you can’t ignore it.”

Read the full article here.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

4 tips to help PR clients navigate the political season

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 14, 2012

Don’t mess with people’s politics. If you do, you’d better have a good reason for it and a strong response plan.

The drama surrounding the Susan G. Komen fiasco is yet another example of how seriously the public takes its politics. The organization that gave special meaning to the color pink, came crashing down when it became known that it had pulled its $700,000 contribution to Planned Parenthood.

Without taking sides on the political issue, one is safe in saying the loss in future contributions and damage to Komen’s reputation will total much more than $700,000.

It’s a good lesson, particularly now that the political season is in full throttle, to review our clients’ political stances and contributions. Clearly, having a heads-up that the CEO is making a contribution to a particular candidate can help in issues-management planning. Here are some tips to help clients get through the season without becoming too much of a target.

Research: Find out whom and which issues your clients support. Even if those stances are not popular, knowing about them before they blow up on a client’s Facebook page can help.

Bigger Picture: Using Komen as an example, there should be a discussion with clients about whether supporting or discontinuing support for a hot-button cause or candidate might do more harm than good. Even if the clients disagree, as PR pros we’ve done our job offering them the likeliest fallout scenarios.

Strategy: Have in place a plan for responding to the media and on social media before a political firestorm hits. Part of the reason Komen had a hard time was the silence on its Facebook page as the deluge of negative comments was posted. A quick, thoughtful response can help.

Grow a thick skin: Politics is nasty business, and facts often get lost in emotions and longstanding beliefs. Even the most robust response plan can get sabotaged. Clients who are aware of the risks of playing politics can better weather the storm, stick to their convictions, and offer measured responses.

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily.com)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Reputation Management | Tagged crisis communication, crisis response, denver, gil rudawsky, groundfloor, issue management, komen, media, planned parenthood, politics | Leave a comment

Investigation quietly dropped, Lance Armstrong and PR team can take victory lap

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: February 9, 2012

Lance Armstrong may never win in the courtroom of public opinion, but he can claim victory in his highly publicized case with federal investigators.

In contrast to the government’s headline-grabbing announcement two years ago that it planned to investigate Armstrong’s alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs, the feds on Friday quietly dropped the case for lack of evidence.

It started making the rounds with the media on Wednesday, but the news was a whisper compared with the crescendo it reached when the case was announced. It’s one of the failings of the media, and a lesson for clients: The launching of an investigation—or the filing of a civil suit—often gets more press than its resolution.

It was only by chance that someone found out this case had been dropped. Many cases simply get tucked away with nary a word, leaving people to wonder what happened—if they haven’t forgotten about them altogether.

We work hard to help clients understand that the government, which media outlets regularly criticize for alleged waste and wrongdoing, gets a free pass when it announces investigations. It gets back to the cliché of being guilty until proven innocent.

Armstrong’s PR team played the case artfully over the last two years. It didn’t engage in the back-and-forth drama engulfing the world-famous cyclist. Instead, it asserted his innocence and pointed to a host of other failed investigations. The truth, or lack of provable evidence, came out in the legal case, but that won’t make big headlines.

At least one media outlet, The Washington Post, notes the irony and turned the spotlight inward:

“While something less than a complete exoneration of Armstrong, the muted end of the investigation raises questions about the media: Did they go too far in painting a picture of misfeasance and illegal behavior by the seven-time Tour de France winner? And did they fail to ask some tough questions about the government’s case?”

Armstrong’s team always pointed to the facts, and even responded to a frontal assault by “60 Minutes” with a single tweet and created a response website that laid out the facts and included backup countering the stream of innuendo.

Robert Luskin, one of Armstrong’s attorneys, told The Washington Post that the news media lapped up the story because they felt it was too good not to be true.

“They become seduced by their sources and take too much at face value,” he said. “No one stops and says, ‘That doesn’t sound right to me.’ ”

(This post also appears on Ragan’s PRDaily)

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, In the News | Tagged crisis communication, crisis response, Lance Armstrong, public relations, rapid response, tour de france | Leave a comment

‘Off the record’ vs. ‘on background’: What every PR pro should know before talking to the media

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: January 31, 2012

The concepts of “on background” and “off the record” are confusing even to some seasoned reporters. It’s no wonder the PR world gets them wrong so often.

In the era of quick-hit reporting and little or no source-building, there are times when it makes sense to provide the media more than simply a short official statement.

In most crisis communication scenarios, a statement is the go-to, tried and true media response. Longer interviews or long responses get shortened or paraphrased—and often misrepresented. There are ways to get an issue across outside of an official statement, but they, too, have pitfalls.

Among those ways is to speak to a reporter off the record.

Going off the record with the media means providing them information that they cannot use. Presumably, they can use the information to help formulate their story or to ask further questions. It should never come out that the information came from you.

It’s a dangerous proposition, and, more often than not, the off-the-record information makes its way into the story, and it becomes clear who provided it. Having a solid rapport with a reporter is the only way this tactic works; otherwise, there is a good chance you will get burned, particularly if the information is juicy.

As a reporter I refused to listen to off-the-record information from sources, because I was afraid that it would end up in my stories and, often times, I suspected it was a trap to get me in trouble.

As a PR practitioner, I recommend never going off the record with the media.

(Find out here why another PR professional thinks you should never go off the record.)

Instead, it might be more useful to provide background information to a reporter. Giving information on background means providing reporters with information that they can use in their stories but cannot attribute to you because it has come from another source.

Though journalists will probably extract text solely from a statement, background information can change the tenor or angle of a story. This is particularly true when you provide factual background documents not intended for public consumption.

With both off-the-record and background discussions, there are gray areas and potential pitfalls. We tell our clients, based on experience in and out of the newsroom, never tell a reporter anything that you don’t want to see in a story.

If you or your client feels compelled to use these tactics, make your expectations clear before passing along the information. Be sure the reporter knows the source and understands the restrictions on its use. Or tell the reporter that the information is off the record and cannot be used or traced back to you. Even then, don’t be surprised if it does.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Media Training | Tagged background, communication, crisis, crisis response, groundfloor media, media, off the record, social media, training | 1 Comment

5 takeaways from the Papa John’s debacle

By Gil Rudawsky | Published: January 13, 2012

It’s a new year and time to dust off your social media crisis plan. Need motivation? Just check out how Papa John’s is mired in the damage caused this week when a single tweet started a media firestorm.

An unofficial count found nearly 500 news hits covering the Papa John’s story. It began with a 10-word tweet from a customer, accompanied by a twitpic of her Papa John’s receipt that referred to her as “lady chinky eyes.”

The customer is the communications manager for ProPublica, a nonprofit investigative journalism outlet.

Now there are calls for boycotts, and phone lines at this particular upper Manhattan franchise are overloaded with prank calls from people ordering Chinese food.

Papa John’s Twitter account went from ebullient tweets about reaching 2 million Facebook fans and giving away free pizzas to posting hundreds of responses about the incident, saying over and over: “We are very upset by recent receipt issue in New York & sincerely apologize to our customer. Franchise employee involved is being terminated.”

The issue was compounded when an employee was quoted in the media as saying, “I think the lady put it out there just to get some attention—some people like that type of attention. I truly don’t think it’s fair. It’s been taking up all our time. It’s been very disruptive.”

I bet it has.

Using this particular incident as a jumping-off point, here are several tips that should be included in any social media crisis plan:

Take immediate action. The speed at which bad news spreads on social media is mind-boggling. Companies need to have a response plan that cuts through the red tape and offers an immediate and appropriate response.

Show sympathy. On social media, an apology goes a long way. No company can manage what every employee does, but it can have policies in place to keep crises from happening. Linking to the policy and getting rid of the employee who breached it are good first steps.

Have one official spokesperson. Route all calls to an official spokesperson, one who knows the messaging. Front-line employees are busy with their jobs and may not be aware of the potential repercussions of their comments.

Ensure it won’t reoccur. Learn from the crisis, and put measures in place to minimize the chances of its happening again.

Think bigger picture. A reputation takes a long time to heal, but grand gestures can help. In the case of Papa John’s, maybe a generous donation to a relevant charity might be on point.

  • Share:
  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this post
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit share via Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • twitter Tweet about this
  • email Tell a friend
Posted in Crisis Communication, Reputation Management, Social Media | Tagged crisis response, denver, expert, groundfloor, issues management, media, papa johns, reputation, Twitter | Leave a comment
« Older posts
Newer posts »
  • Crisis Lines

    • Crisis Blog Home
    • Rapid Response Team
    • Strategic Counsel
    • Social Media
    • Crisis Planning
    • Media Training
    • Media Monitoring
    • Reputation Management
    • Case Studies
    • Contact
  • Contact the GFM Crisis Team

    Like all blogs, we thrive on feedback, so don't be shy! If you have a comment, a suggestion or a question, please leave us a comment or shoot us an email at crisis@groundfloormedia.com or call at 303-865-8155. You can also read more about GFM at groundfloormedia.com.

  • Categories

    • Crisis Communication
    • In the News
    • Internal Communications
    • Issues Management
    • Media Training
    • Reputation Management
    • Social Media
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
  • Blogroll

    • Bulletproof Blog
    • CommCore MEDIAtor Blog
    • Drudge Report
    • Holtz Communication Blog
    • Jim Romenesko
    • Politico
    • Poynter MediaWire
    • Ragan’s PR Daily
    • ReputationXchange.com
    • The Daily Lark
  • GFM Rapid Response RSS Feeds

    • All posts
    • All comments
 
 
© 2012 GroundFloor Media